Feb 172018

Today is Random Acts of Kindness Day in the US. In fact, the second full week of February is designated as Random Acts of Kindness week. It is celebrated on different days across the world. For example, it is celebrated on September 1 in New Zealand, and November 13 in many other countries. The phrase “random acts of kindness” comes from the longer, now famous, phrase “practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty” written by Anne Herbert on a placemat in Sausalito, California in 1982. It was meant as an antonym to the common news phrases “random acts of violence and senseless acts of cruelty.” I do want to celebrate the notion, but I’ll add a small qualification or two.

First, I do not like designating ONE day (or one week) as the time to do good stuff, so that you can be a selfish jerk for the other 364. When I was married, my late wife and I NEVER did anything special on St Valentine’s Day. Our reasoning was that if you love someone you do loving things for that person whenever you feel like it. I have given chocolates, flowers, jewelry, to girlfriends on random days of the year because I feel like it. I do not need ONE day as permission to do it. I do think that the word “random” is important, however. The essence is to be kind to strangers, or to be kind for no reason. I like that. When Jesus said “love your enemies” he was making a somewhat similar point because he added, “For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have?” (Matthew 5). If we are kind to people who are kind to us, there is no real merit to the kindness. If you are kind for absolutely no reason, you are doing something far greater. The world needs that sort of kindness.

Second, it is important not to practice random acts of kindness because you expect thanks. Some of the random acts of kindness discussed on websites are expressly anonymous so that the recipient cannot thank you because that person does not even know who you are. For example, in Naples there used to be a custom called caffè sospeso (literally “suspended coffee”) In the working-class cafés of Naples, when a person had experienced good luck he/she would pay for two coffees, but drink only one. The second payment was left until a person enquired later whether a sospeso was available. That means that if you were broke that day and could not afford to buy even a cup of coffee, you might benefit from the kindness of a stranger. I like it.

The Random Acts of Kindness Foundation (RAK) was founded in 1995 in the US. It is a nonprofit headquartered in Denver, Colorado. Its website is: https://www.randomactsofkindness.org/

Anne Herbert, originator of the phrase, put out a book called Random Kindness and Senseless Acts of Beauty 1993 detailing true stories of acts of kindness.

Some special days are difficult for me to find recipes for. Searching the internet was not very helpful. Several sites suggested sharing your favorite recipe, but I have already shared numerous favorites. In looking around, though, I found a recipe for ground beef and rice that reminded me of a dish I concocted back in my student days when I was just learning how to cook. I do not remember how I hit upon it, but I used to make it all the time. I never measured anything, and I dumped in what I had most of the time, but here’s the basics.

© Tío Juan’s Ground Beef and Rice


1 onion, peeled and sliced
1 bell pepper, cored, seeded, and sliced.
½ lb ground beef
1 cup long grain rice
beef stock
dried oregano
fresh parsley, chopped
vegetable oil


Grease a heavy skillet lightly. Sauté the onion and pepper over medium heat until they soften. Add the ground beef and brown, stirring frequently.

Add the rice to the beef and vegetable mixture and stir to coat with oil. Add beef stock to cover and bring to a steady simmer. Add oregano and parsley to taste.

Keep a pot of stock simmering separately.

Continue simmering the beef and rice, and as the rice absorbs the stock add a little more from the spare pot.

After about 20 minutes, check the rice to see if it is cooked. You are trying to balance things so that when the rice is fully cooked the mixture does not have excess stock. By being vigilant you will know when to stop adding stock.

Serve hot from the skillet.

NOTES: You can add pretty much any vegetables you have on hand such as peas, tomatoes, green beans, or zucchini. When I was broke I always had something on hand to add for variety.

Sep 242017

Today is the birthday (1890) of Sir Alan Patrick Herbert CH, usually known as A. P. Herbert, English humorist, novelist, playwright and law reform activist who served as an Independent Member of Parliament (MP) for Oxford University from the 1935 general election to the 1950 general election, when university constituencies were abolished. His most famous short stories, first published in Punch under the general title Misleading Cases, are fictitious law cases in which Herbert explores apparently absurd aspects of the law, and in which the protagonist, Albert Haddock, representing Herbert’s point of view, upholds his civil liberties by taking many to court, defending himself without counsel, and usually winning. Herbert himself said “Albert Haddock made his first public appearance, in Punch, in 1924. I have always understood that I invented him: but he has made some disturbing escapes into real life.” Over his lifetime Herbert published five collections: Misleading Cases in the Common Law, More Misleading Cases, Still More Misleading Cases, Codd’s Last Case, and Bardot M.P.?.

Herbert was born in Ashtead in Surrey and attended New College, Oxford where he received a first in Schools in Jurisprudence in 1914. He joined the Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve as an ordinary seaman after the outbreak of World War I, later serving as an officer with the Royal Naval Division. He fought in the Gallipoli campaign and on the Western Front, becoming his battalion’s adjutant in 1917, following which he was injured and did not return to the front line before the end of the war. Following the war, he published The Secret Battle and joined the permanent staff of Punch in 1924. He also wrote the librettos for several musicals.

Herbert was elected as the Independent MP for Oxford University in the 1935 general election. Before the outbreak of World War II, Herbert campaigned for private member’s rights, piloted the Matrimonial Causes Act 1937 through Parliament, opposed the Entertainments Duty and campaigned against the Oxford Group. He enlisted in the River Emergency Service in 1938 and served in World War II as a Petty Officer in the Royal Naval Auxiliary Patrol. He captained the river boat, Water Gipsy, assigned to the River Thames. In 1943, he was part of a parliamentary commission sent to investigate the future of the Dominion of Newfoundland.

Herbert loved the River Thames and lived beside the river in Hammersmith in West London. He was a Conservator (a member of the Thames Conservancy Board) and a Freeman of the Company of Watermen and Lightermen. In 1966 he wrote The Thames in which he explored numerous aspects of the river.

In the last days of 1970, Herbert was taken to Middlesex Hospital in Fitzrovia, following a seizure that affected his left side and arm. Within six weeks, he was home again, and over many months his physical powers waned. In August 1971, he wrote his last letter to The Times, an appeal for parliamentary good manners in refraining from “witty derision of the literary exertions of Mr Harold Wilson” and of the “marine activities” of Edward Heath. By then, he was describing himself as “a recumbent nuisance.” He died on 11 November 1971, and obituaries were published in both The Times and Punch. The Times supplemented their obituary notice with a leading article. They described him as having done “more than any man of his day to add to the gaiety of the nation.”

Herbert’s most famous fictitious case is undoubtedly Board of Inland Revenue v Haddock (also known as the Negotiable Cow). The case has evolved into an urban legend. In this case, Albert Haddock had been in disagreement with the Collector of Taxes over the size of his tax bill. Haddock complained that the sum was excessive, particularly in view of the inadequate consideration he believed that he received from that Government in service. Eventually the Collector demanded £57 and 10 shillings. Haddock appeared at the offices of the Collector of Taxes and delivered a white cow “of malevolent aspect”. On the cow was stenciled in red ink:

To the London and Literary Bank, Limited

Pay the Collector of Taxes, who is no gentleman, or Order, the sum of fifty seven pounds £57/0/0 (and may he rot!)


Haddock tendered the cow in payment of his bill and demanded a receipt.

During the hearing, the fictitious judge, Sir Basil String, enquired whether stamp duty had been paid. The prosecutor, Sir Joshua Hoot KC confirmed that a two-penny stamp was “affixed to the dexter horn of the cow.” The collector declined the cow, objecting that it would be impossible to pay it into a bank account. Haddock suggested that he endorse the cow to a third party to whom he might owe money, adding that “there must be many persons in that position.”

Sir Joshua informed the court that the collector did try to endorse the cheque on its back, in this case on the abdomen. However, Sir Joshua explained: “the cow … appeared to resent endorsement and adopted a menacing posture.” The collector abandoned the attempt and declined to take the cheque. Haddock led the cow away and was arrested in Trafalgar Square for causing an obstruction, leading to the co-joined criminal case, R. v Haddock.

He testified that he had tendered a cheque in payment of income tax. A cheque was only an order to a bank to pay money to the person in possession of the cheque or a person named on the cheque, and there was nothing in law to say it must be on paper of specified dimensions. A cheque, he argued, could be written on notepaper. He said he had “drawn cheques on the backs of menus, on napkins, on handkerchiefs, on the labels of wine bottles; all these cheques had been duly honored by his bank and passed through the Bankers’ Clearing House”. He thought that there was no distinction in law between a cheque on a napkin and a cheque on a cow.

When asked as to motive, he said he did not have a piece of paper to hand. Horses and other animals used to be seen frequently in the streets of London. He admitted on cross-examination that he may have had in his mind an idea to ridicule the taxman. “But why not? There is no law against ridiculing the income tax.” In relation to the criminal prosecution, Haddock said it was a nice thing if in the heart of the commercial capital of the world a man could not convey a negotiable instrument down the street without being arrested. If a disturbance was caused by a crowd, the policeman should arrest the crowd, not him. The judge, sympathetic to Haddock, found in his favor on the tax claim, but in favor of the prosecution for causing a disturbance. By tendering and being refused the cow, the Inland Revenue was estopped from demanding it later.


Negotiable instruments and other legal documents have been written on unusual surfaces. Documented cases provide illustrations of wills on the side of empty egg-shells, and cheques being written on a variety of strange surfaces. An often-cited example is a Canadian farmer who, while trapped under his own tractor, carved a holographic will into the tractor’s fender. The fender was probated and stood as his will, and is currently on display at the law library of the University of Saskatchewan College of Law. In Jewish law a get can be written on any durable material, including the horn of a cow. If the horn is still attached to the cow, the husband must give the wife the whole cow.

Board of Inland Revenue v. Haddock was dramatized for BBC television as “The Negotiable Cow” as the opening of the first series of A. P. Herbert’s Misleading Cases in 1967, with Roy Dotrice as Albert Haddock and Alastair Sim as Mr Justice Swallow. The BBC did not keep tapes of all its shows in those days but there are audio recordings of some and snippets available on YouTube.

In light of Herbert’s protagonist’s name, a dish of haddock is the order of the day I feel.  I enjoy a fillet of smoked haddock for breakfast, poached and served with a buttered crusty roll.  Haddock and chips also used to be a favorite of mine when I frequented chippies. Baked haddock is also a simple and satisfying dish. This is a classic English recipe.

Baked Haddock


2 lbs haddock fillets
salt and pepper
3 tbsp butter, melted (plus extra for greasing)
2 tsp lemon juice
2 garlic cloves, minced
fresh parsley, chopped
crushed tarragon


Preheat the oven to 350˚F. Lightly grease a large shallow baking dish.

Pat the haddock dry and arrange it in the prepared baking dish. Sprinkle with salt and pepper to taste.

In a small bowl, mix together the melted butter, lemon juice and minced garlic. Evenly brush the seasoned butter over the haddock fillets, then sprinkle the fillets with parsley, tarragon, and paprika.

Bake at 350 for 25-35 minutes or until it is opaque and flakes easily. Serve with poached asparagus or fresh green peas, (and lemon wedges if you like).